Panel Description:<\/b> Love it, hate it, love\/hate it, Joss Whedon’s Dollhouse definitely has feminist and racial issues worth talking about. What were its good points? Its bad points? Does the good outweigh the bad, or vice versa? Was it canceled too soon or not soon enough?<\/p>\n
Panelists:<\/b> Kater Cheek, Sigrid Ellis, Anastasia Salter, Charlie Jane Anders (moderator), K. Tempest Bradford<\/p>\n
Rundown of people\u2019s reasons for being on the panel. Anastasia and Charlie Jane both loved the show, while acknowledging that it had its problems as well. Anastasia was particularly intrigued by the show\u2019s dissociation of identity from body. Kater loved Firefly, but got fed up with Dollhouse and didn\u2019t even watch it to the end. Tempest watched Dollhouse because she was reviewing it for Fantasy Magazine<\/a>, but she never liked it. Sigrid is mostly in the \u201cliked it\u201d camp, but has quite a few criticisms as well.<\/p>\n Sigrid explains the concept of the \u201cBig Sexy Hospital\u201d, a show that fans watch because they love the actors and want to see them play an essentially similar character with different notes. \u201cHelo\u2019s playing another big dumb hunk of meat, tries to do good and makes bad decisions.\u201d<\/p>\n Someone asks how the professor (from \u201cBelle Chose\u201d) could afford the Dollhouse\u2019s services. Tempest says he\u2019s probably one of those professors who assigns a single text book to all the freshman, and there\u2019s a new edition every year. Audience LOL.<\/p>\n There is a lot of ragging on Eliza Dushku on this panel, which I don\u2019t think is really fair.<\/p>\n Charlie Jane asks: Was the show feminist? Was it trying to be?<\/p>\n Anastasia says yes, and that the treatment of sexuality was usually supposed to be harrowing. Tempest says she doesn\u2019t think Joss Whedon\u2019s feminism is as developed as people say. An audience member points out that Tempest already admitted she hasn\u2019t seen a lot of Joss\u2019s shows, implying that she might not be in a position to make an informed judgment on this question.<\/p>\n Tempest lists three levels of \u201cgetting it\u201d regarding racism:<\/p>\n 1) Totally racist. Tempest says the same breakdown applies to sexism, and says she thinks Joss Whedon is at level 2. Others disagree. Charlie Jane relates an account of a conversation with Joss in which he said that we ought to root for Echo and the other dolls because they have been disempowered and are going to get their identities back.<\/p>\n Tempest says that there have already been enough shows that depict female exploitation, and that there is absolutely no reason to do any more. They just aren\u2019t feminist.<\/p>\n A woman in the audience gives an impassioned rant about how Dollhouse doesn\u2019t have to be a female empowerment show to be feminist.<\/p>\n Pretty much everyone agrees that Boyd was screwed over. His character arc didn’t make any sense, and some think his early depiction as one of the few men who isn’t attracted to Echo is kind of racist. Because of course a black man who is attracted to a white woman would be too threatening.<\/p>\n I gave up on trying to take notes. Too many people talking over one another, and too much annoyance at ill-informed opinions.<\/p>\n
\n2) I was taught that racism was bad, but it\u2019s still there in my head and I haven\u2019t really examined it.
\n3) Personal and social examination leading to true ally behavior.<\/p>\n